References

Annapureddy, R., Fornaroli, A., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2024). Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 3685680. https://doi.org/10.1145/3685680

Baig, M. M., Hobson, C., GholamHosseini, H., Ullah, E., & Afifi, S. (2024). Generative AI in Improving Personalized Patient Care Plans: Opportunities and Barriers Towards Its Wider Adoption. Applied Sciences, 14(23), 10899. http://doi.org/10.3390/app142310899

Bilika, P., Stefanouli, V., Strimpakos, N., & Kapreli, E. V. (2024). Clinical reasoning using ChatGPT: Is it beyond credibility for physiotherapists use? Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 38073539. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38073539

Bragazzi, N. L., & Garbarino, S. (2024). Toward Clinical Generative AI: Conceptual Framework. JMIR AI, 3(1), e55957. https://doi.org/10.2196/55957

Cabral S, Restrepo D, Kanjee Z, et al. Clinical Reasoning of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Model Compared With Physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(5):581–583. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0295

Chaddad, A., Peng, J., Xu, J., & Bouridane, A. (2023). Survey of Explainable AI Techniques in Healthcare. Sensors, 23(2), 634–634. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020634

Chen, Y., & Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh. (2024). Generative AI in Medical Practice: In-Depth Exploration of Privacy and Security Challenges. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e53008–e53008. https://doi.org/10.2196/53008

European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Khowaja SA, Khuwaja P, Dev K, Wang W, Nkenyereye L. (2024). ChatGPT needs SPADE (Sustainability, PrivAcy, Digital divide, and Ethics) evaluation: A review. Cognitive Computation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-024-10285-1

Natali, C., Marconi, L., Dias Duran, L. D., Miglioretti, M., & Cabitza, F. (2025). AI-Induced Deskilling in Medicine: A Mixed Method Literature Review for Setting a New Research Agenda (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5166364). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5166364

Price, W. N., Gerke, S., & Cohen, I. G. (2019). Potential Liability for Physicians Using Artificial Intelligence. JAMA, 322(18), 1765. https://doi.org/10/gf9qbv

Rowe, M., Nicholls, D. A., & Shaw, J. (2022). How to replace a physiotherapist: Artificial intelligence and the redistribution of expertise. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 38(13), 2275–2283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.1934924

Sarkar, U., & Bates, D. W. (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Primary Care for Patients and Clinicians. JAMA Internal Medicine, 184(4), 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7965

Si, C., Yang, D., & Hashimoto, T. (2024). Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers (No. arXiv:2409.04109). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04109

Steyvers, M., & Kumar, A. (2023). Three Challenges for AI-Assisted Decision-Making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(5), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231181102

Wah, J. N. K. (2025). Revolutionizing e-health: the transformative role of AI-powered hybrid chatbots in healthcare solutions. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1530799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1530799